At a basic level, the word “alternative” simply means another choice without reference to quality or benefit.
To some, “alternative energy” is a misnomer originated at the onset of the first oil embargo in 1973 when promises associated with cost and performance of power systems like solar and wind were made long before their physical capabilities were known.
The purpose of this article is to begin understanding the economic viability of alternative energy choices.
Cost is defined in economic terms as “the value of money that has been used up to produce something, and hence is not available for use anymore.” We must be sure that cost is understood amidst the fog of grants, government subsidies, tax credits or any other means of paying for these projects beyond privately sourced dollars. Government funding only changes the source of the money to pay for alternative energy systems but not the “cost” of the product. We all pay the “cost” no matter what governmental scheme is used. It is important to understand the definition of cost in order to determine the economic viability of alternative energy purchase.
The state and federal governments are remiss for lacking a definition that quantifies “viable” alternative energy solutions (i.e., one-year payback) from impractical choices (i.e., 200-year payback), therefore the most impractical alternatives receive the same recognition and government benefits as the most practical choices at the detriment of losing the circulation of good money that could otherwise be more wisely invested on behalf of the taxpayers.
For instance a $16,500 wind turbine that can’t produce enough power to keep a 100-watt light bulb going for a full year presently receives a 30 percent federal tax credit of $5,000, a state tax credit and a rebate from Efficiency Maine which was collected from electricity rate payers.
Does that make sense?
Legislation typically includes, in boiler plate form, the phrase “alternatives such as solar, wind and geothermal” when reflecting on government incentives without regard for the issue of economic viability.
To some, “alternative energy” is a misnomer originated at the onset of the first oil embargo in 1973 when promises associated with cost and performance of power systems like solar and wind were made long before their physical capabilities were known.
Other success stories include Hayward-based Primus Power, which used a $95000 PIER grant to parlay a garage-developed technology into a successful venture that has installed a 25 megawatt grid storage system in Northern California.
The 11 th Circuit Court of Appeals recently found the individual mandate of ObamaCare unconstitutional. This would seem to be a death blow against the entire rationale for the enterprise, since forcing people to buy government-approved

In this letter to the editor, CSC Australia and Asia chief technology & innovation officer Bob Hayward responds to our critical comments about the company's recently launched BizCloud offering. Hayward is also a former director of IT advisory at KPMG

August 18 - The Port of San Francisco recently welcomed the M/V Star Hansa, carrying wind turbine components for San Leandro, California-based Halus Power Systems. Halus imported wind tower sections, blades, nacelles, hubs and other parts for three